Maritime Anti Piracy
(Print Version Here)
Training
For the conduct of Maritime Anti-Piracy training
we have identified instructors that not only
have the operational skills and experience to
provide top quality training, but who are also
highly committed, and have the communication
skills and personality to excel in working with
the foreign personnel. They are tactical
operators, with extensive experience in teaching
these skills to foreign military and police
forces.
There are now a number of conventions that are
really being enforced by most governments around
the world. (ISPS Code - See explanation below)
These all impact on any potential government or
none government ports, maritime or shipping line
client and what can be offered to them.
There are number of areas that we can focus on
to assist any government or none government
maritime or ports user:
· Security assets to 'ships underway' and
'alongside'
· Port security assets and advice on security
infrastructure and S.O.P's
· Surveillance and counter surveillance
· Threat counter measures and S.O.P's
· Intelligence and threat analysis
· Route planning
· Communications
· Emergency response and Crisis Management
· Security assessment of ports and client
flagged ship
· Security plans and training to mitigate
threats
· Audits of current security plans and S.O.P's
· Conducting desktop and physical exercises of
all ports and client flagged ships
International Trends
The Asian Regional Forum on Capacity Building of
Maritime Security held in Tokyo in December
2005, highlighted the different approaches that
nations take to maritime security and which
national government organisation coordinates and
takes responsibility for maritime security.
Amongst countries that are signatories to SOLAS
and have ratified and implemented the ISPS Code,
the national legislative frameworks vary from
country to country.
A number of countries, particularly in the Asia-
Pacific region and the Indian sub continent, are
primarily focused on the response side of
maritime security threats. This in most cases
involves a very heavily Defence-orientated
national structure, and is in contrast with
other countries which focus on risk
identification and mitigation.
The Baltic and International Maritime Council (BIMCO)
also use maritime security provisions to
incorporate the risks associated with drug
smuggling, piracy and armed robbery against
ship, stowaways, migrant smuggling and the
threat of terrorism.
Another issue that is receiving a lot of
international scrutiny is the importance of the
primacy of sovereignty of states in relation to
the security of sea-lanes. Nevertheless, to
tackle newly emerging maritime security threats
there is a role for the user states and for
private companies (both shipping and insurance)
to ensure that sea-lanes remain secure. Malaysia
and Singapore have indicated in a number of
international forums that there is a
responsibility of all users of the Malacca
Straights to implement stringent security
arrangements. However tying in with these
governments and shipping companies is not easy.
Usually those tied in with Lloyds or other
insurance companies that cover shipping get this
work referred to them.
ISPS Code
The International Ship and Port Security (ISPS)
Code is an international initiative to mitigate
risks to shipping from the worldwide escalation
of terrorism that were manifested in the events
of September 11, 2001. The Code requires
governments to implement and administer a ship
and port facility security regime. Of special
importance is the Convention for the Suppression
of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Maritime
Navigation 1988 (SUA Convention). This
Convention was developed in response to growing
concerns during the 1980s about unlawful acts
which threaten the safety of ships and the
security of their passengers and crews, with
reports of crew being kidnapped, ships being
hi-jacked, deliberately run aground or blown up
by explosives. The SUA Convention:
· establishes a legal regime applicable to acts
against international maritime navigation that
is similar to the regimes established against
international aviation; and
· makes it an offence for a person unlawfully
and intentionally to seize or exercise control
over a ship by force, threat, or intimidation;
to perform an act of violence against a person
on board a ship if that act is likely to
endanger the safe navigation of the ship; to
place a destructive device or substance aboard a
ship; and other acts against the safety of
ships.
|